|
Printer
Friendly
Version
10/04/2008
By Meir
Javedanfar
On
April 8th, Iran’s National Day of Nuclear
Technology, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad declared
that Iranian scientists were “putting 6,000 new
centrifuges into place”. This statement indicates that
Iran will be adding another 3,000 centrifuges to the
3,000 already installed and declared to the
International Atomic Energy Agency
(IAEA).
Ahamidnejad went on to say that Iranian
scientists were testing a new type of centrifuge that
works five times faster the P1 centrifuges which Iran is
already operating.
The
Iranian president could be boasting. Some analysts, such
as those close to the IAEA, said today that Iran is
having enough difficulties operating its current 3,000
centrifuges. Therefore its unlikely that Iran could
install and run more.
This
may be a valid assumption. With the economy in the
doldrums, and presidential elections approaching,
Ahmadinejad needs all the prestige he can muster to
boost his falling popularity.
Furthermore, the Iranian government has recently
asked the Americans to start new negotiations over Iraq.
By making its nuclear program look more advanced than it
is, Ahmadinejad, and his boss Ayatollah Khamenei, may be
hoping that this could translate into a stronger
bargaining position for Tehran at the negotiating
table.
However, one must not also rule out the
possibility that Ahmadinejad is telling the truth.
Telling a lie of this proportion could be a severe
embarrassment for the president, as such claims will
have to be substantiated during IAEA’s future
inspections to Iran’s nuclear
facilities.
If they
can not be substantiated, not only would such claims
make the Iranian president look like a liar, it could
also lead to further suspicion that despite the NIE
report, Iran is running a secret nuclear
program.
With
sanctions failing to deter the Iranian government, as
far as Iran’s supreme leader is concerned, nothing —
apart from technical difficulties — could halt Iran’s
march to nuclear glory. Luckily for Ahmadinejad, when it
comes to the nuclear program, he has the full backing of
the supreme leader, who has the final word over such
matters.
This
should make the leaders of the Western world very
worried. With the situation in Gaza and Lebanon
worsening every day, such confidence shown by Iran could
translate into major outbreak of violence in those
troubled areas.
This
could push Sunni countries into the direction of
developing their own nuclear programs. Furthermore,
concerned by Iran’s expanding influence in Iraq and
their growing belligerence in the Middle East, Sunni
countries could continue or even increase their
financial support to Sunni fighters in Iraq, as Saudi
Arabia has been doing. In such a case the US could
forget about total withdrawal from Iraq within the next
year, or even two, no matter what Democrats promise to
American voters.
Although the US seems hopeless in its efforts to
bring international consensus against Iran in the UN,
there is nevertheless one area which Washington could
hurt Iran’s regional drive: Iraq.
The
American government must listen to General Petraeus’s recommendation
that US troop withdrawals from Iraq should be suspended.
The current US advances in bringing more security to
Iraq is one of the reasons why Iran recently decided to
request more talks with Washington. To lose this
advantage could mean losing one of the only means of
leverage America has against Iran.
If
anything, more troops are needed for Iraq. However, this
seems unlikely as the mounting casualties have left the
US population with little appetite to send more of their
sons to war.
Instead
of this, more money should be pumped into Iraq’s
reconstruction projects as a means of increasing
America’s position in Iraq and decreasing Iran’s clout.
And the money does not have to only come from the US.
America could pressure the Saudis into redirecting some
of their current assistance to insurgents, into
reconstruction projects in Iraq.
In
absence of more troops, increased economic welfare for
Iraqis could reduce Iran’s influence in Iraq thus
forcing Ayatollah Khamenei and his soldier Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad to rethink their current belligerent
strategy.
For
now, Iran is clearly the winner. Its nuclear program and
influence in the region is moving forward. It seems
unlikely that the international community could do much
to halt its nuclear drive. However, Tehran’s regional
influence is more susceptible to pressures and
challenges. Unless this weak spot is exploited, the West
could soon be looking at a regional nuclear super power
whose president is not shy to publicly
doubt September 11th and its 3000
victims.
This article originally
appeared in PJM
Media
. Meir
Javedanfar is the co-author with Yossi Melman of “The
Nuclear Sphinx of Tehran – Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and the
State of Iran.”
For a free subscription to
the meepas Middle East Analysis Review send an e-mail to
subscribe@meepas.com
Logon to meepas.com for access to detailed background and current political and economic analysis of
16
Middle Eastern countries.
www.meepas.com All rights reserved - Site Rules
|